Search for: "Brown v. Bickel" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wechsler and Bickel were hardly alone among the liberal professoriate. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Session 6: Role of the Judiciary Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (1986). [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
In this Article, I present the flurry of engagement with the history of the Fourteenth Amendment during the litigation of Brown v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
  Question: As a matter of originalist jurisprudence, do you think Alexander Bickel’s memorandum for Justice Felix Frankfurter in Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
This is essentially his argument about Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019). [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:01 am by SHG
The distinction between the Supreme Court’s judgment and precedent is often conflated due to Cooper v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:35 pm by Neil Siegel
  That dialectical process, which this Article calls “reciprocal legitimation,” was present along the path from Brown v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am by Ernest Young
Wade by seeking an abortion in another state, and the plaintiff-parents in Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:46 am by Stephen Wermiel
Much of the work of the Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren qualifies, from Brown v. [read post]