Search for: "Brown v. Campbell"
Results 141 - 160
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
In Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2008] QB 103 at para 61), the Court considered the impact of “information which is made available to a person’s circle of friends or work colleagues and information which is widely published in a newspaper”. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:39 am
Heather Payne, Consultant PaediatricianPanelist: James Campbell, Forensic Toxicologist [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am
As I have already pointed out, in Campbell v MGN Ltd the public interest was said to arise from the fact that Ms Campbell had publicly lied to conceal her drug habit. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:10 am
In Chwick v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
Campbell, JudgeRepresenting Appellants (Plaintiffs): Daniel B. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
But the facts in Campbell v MGN also demonstrate that the current Government proposals for ensuring access to justice in this field will not work. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm
EIR 2004, reg 12(4)(b) – whether request is manifestly unreasonable: Robert Brown v IC EA/2010/0119. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Campbell & William Brown, Assessing Effects of Pretrial Publicity through Agenda-Setting and Framing. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:33 am
The facts in McCoy v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
It was conceded by the claimant in the Naomi Campbell case that it was in the “public interest” to set the record straight about her false public statements about drug-taking (See Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 at [24], [58] and [151]). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
How this works in practice is demonstrated by Campbell and McKennitt (at the trial stage) and Browne (on an interim injunction application). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
A similar distinction was recognized in Lord Browne of Madingley. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The House of Lords in the British Broadcasting Corporation case [2010] 1 AC 145 appeared to be in no doubt that Article 8 conferred a right to reputation that must be balanced, in an appropriate case, against the rights conferred by Article 10: see Lord Hope at [22] and [28] and Lord Brown at [69]. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 am
He points out that the same approach applies to chief executives of multinational companies, mentioning Fressoz & Roire v France and the Lord Browne of Madingley case. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
This controversial passage was qualified six months later by a differently constituted Court of Appeal in Campbell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) – and that Mr Justice Eady was not party to a single one of these decisions (although appeals against his rulings were dismissed in McKennitt and Lord Browne). [read post]
