Search for: "Brown v. Commanding Officer" Results 1 - 20 of 212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 371; and retaliation against a federal law enforcement officer under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 371; and retaliation against a federal law enforcement officer under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 371; and retaliation against a federal law enforcement officer under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:29 am
Officers query to “come over here” was not a command that could legally be ignored. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the case of Brown v Texas, the People's burden of proof as to the programmatic purpose is derived from the constitutional principle underlying the reasonableness of a suspicionless roadblock stop, i.e., a weighing of the gravity of the public concerns served by the seizure, the degree to which the seizure advances the public interest, and the severity of the interference with individual liberty. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
 When an officer turns on her lights, and those lights are clearly (as here) directed at you, I think it make sense to generally view that display as a command. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am by admin
Then, in 1980, the Court upheld an Air Force rule in Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 12:35 pm
” With regard to the initial command to stop, the Court distinguishes the facts of United States v. [read post]