Search for: "Brown v. Federated Department Stores, Inc"
Results 61 - 77
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
McCoy, No. 06-4850 "Grant of a motion to suppress evidence seized after the detention and search of the defendant in a grocery store parking lot is reversed and remanded where the searching officer possessed a reasonable, articulable suspicion that defendant was engaged in serious criminality when the officer stopped and frisked him. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
Supp. 3d 521 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (applying Upjohn to protect internal investigation records, including witnesses communications); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
” Theatre Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The claim concerns a class action lawsuit which accuses Google and its AI department of misusing patient data stored by a kidney injury alert app. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Financial Aspects of Intellectual Property) Climate change and Millenium Development Goals top agenda during UN Secretary General’s visit to WIPO (WIPO) Global - Trade Marks / Brands What every marketing department needs to know about trade marks (IP Spotlight) Forbes 2008 list of ‘Top-earning Dead Celebrities’ (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Trade mark protection, broadcast rights vital for sports, say stakeholders (Intellectual Property Watch) How many drafts… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
See Duane Reade, Inc., 342 NLRB 1016, 1017 (2004). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
Even after the Brown v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
Last year, a federal study determined that professional image examiners matched faces more accurately than untrained students — providing the first scientific basis for a photograph comparison field. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
AB 2535 comes on the heels of the recent federal decision, Garnett v. [read post]
