Search for: "Brown v. Federated Department Stores, Inc" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Hoffman, 43, also of Beckley, cleaned out plating tanks and stored the waste material on site without a permit. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Department of Interior, 538 U.S. 803 (2003). [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
These regulations require that facilities handling or storing a certain volume of oil take specific actions to prepare for and prevent spills. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Financial Aspects of Intellectual Property) Climate change and Millenium Development Goals top agenda during UN Secretary General’s visit to WIPO (WIPO) Global - Trade Marks / Brands What every marketing department needs to know about trade marks (IP Spotlight) Forbes 2008 list of ‘Top-earning Dead Celebrities’ (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Trade mark protection, broadcast rights vital for sports, say stakeholders (Intellectual Property Watch) How many drafts… [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Branker, No. 07-8 Denial of habeas petition challenging convictions for the murder of a state trooper and a deputy sheriff is affirmed where: 1) the Supreme Court of North Carolina did not unreasonably apply the clearly established federal law of Batson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
McCoy, No. 06-4850 "Grant of a motion to suppress evidence seized after the detention and search of the defendant in a grocery store parking lot is reversed and remanded where the searching officer possessed a reasonable, articulable suspicion that defendant was engaged in serious criminality when the officer stopped and frisked him. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
See Duane Reade, Inc., 342 NLRB 1016, 1017 (2004). [read post]