Search for: "Brown v. General Motors, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
” Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (disallowing opinion of expert witness, who “lacked any scientific basis for an opinion about … motives,” about defendant’s failure to add safety measure in order to “save money”); In re Diet Drugs Prods. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC (2022) 84 CA5th 466. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
Dist., 55 Cal. 2d 224, 232 (1961), abrogated on other grounds by Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:53 am
The other case in this category is Citadel Securities LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:11 am
The case is entitled Brown v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
See Brown Shoe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
., LLC v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 06167 Decided on November 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department is a novel defense to a claim of deceit. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 5:03 am
Third, the district court applied the wrong law when it relied on Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
General Motors LLC, Nilsson was injured when a “self-driving” Chevrolet Bolt suddenly changed lanes and collided with his motorcycle.[5] There was a human driver in the Bolt at the time of collision, but he did not have his hands on the wheel while its autonomous mode was engaged. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am
See Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:08 pm
Nyack Motor Hotel Inc., 2020 WL 1140783 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
Churchill Downs Racetrack, LLC, v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Brown, Kenneth M. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
As in Forby v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 3:25 pm
" Alliance Royalties, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:11 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:13 am
Kia Motors America Corp. v. [read post]
