Search for: "Brown v. Griffin" Results 81 - 100 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Metzgar and Kellogg, Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Donald Falk discusses this week’s grant in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:08 am by Timothy P. Flynn
For example, in the wake of the landmark 1954 decision in Brown v Board of Education, desegregating all public schools, the Commonwealth responded first, by refusing to comply with the decision, then taking the unusual step of closing their public schools from 1959 to 1964, until the SCOTUS righted the ship in Griffin v Prince Edward County. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Taylor of Morrison Foerster on the firm’s blog, SociallyAware Two Washer Cases Provide the Supreme Court with Its Best Opportunity Since Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Brian Netter discusses last week’s grant in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:26 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Dallas lawyer Angel Reyes of Reyes Browne Reilley in his Angel Reyes Blog Due Diligence on Expert Witnesses: Assume the Worst – Corporate investigator Philip Segal of Charles Griffin Intelligence on their blog, The Ethical Investigator Can you inherit debt? [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
At Balkinization, Stephen Griffin provides a “skeptical take” on Fisher v. [read post]