Search for: "Brown v. Hale"
Results 81 - 100
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 2:59 pm
Brown Easements: Ching v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
Brown, 382 F. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
Lord Brown concurs and adds: The looking after required does not have to be for either nursing or personal care. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
Authored by Mark Flanagan, Patrick Carome and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Hale. * GitHub Letter. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
The uninsured motorist carrier sought dismissal of the complaint, relying on Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:48 am
The appeal was heard and will be considered by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
”); Hale v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
It will be for the seven Justices (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown and Clarke, and Sir John Dyson SCJ) hearing the appeals in these two parallel cases finally to determine the relationship of the Upper Tribunal to the courts in England and in Scotland respectively and, thus, whether the English and Scottish stories shall share the same ending. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The three linked appeals, Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, will be heard in the Supreme Court this week by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
“Everyone knows Brown but there are cases leading up to Brown and way past Brown. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
By a 3-2 majority their Lordships (Lords Hope, Carswell and Brown) held that she was not habitually resident (Baroness Hale and Lord Neuberger dissenting). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am
The Supreme Court again considered Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s judgment in the case of Target Holdings (above). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Lord Brown’s dissenting judgment is considered below. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
On Thursday 28 July 2011, Lord Phillips, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case Ministry of Defence v AB and others. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
Hale had a child who was murdered. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
The view of Lady Hale in M v Slough 'has commanded general acceptance', citing: I remain of the view which I expressed in Wahid [2003] HLR 2, at para 32, that the natural and ordinary meaning of the words 'care and attention' in this context is 'looking after'. [read post]
