Search for: "Brown v. King*" Results 201 - 220 of 917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am by Jeanne Huang
Moreover, a delay of proceeding is distinct from the urgency of proceeding contemplated in r 1.34, as per Swan Brewery Co Ltd v Atlee. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:43 am by Guest Author
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, where the MQD operates as a “carveout from Chevron deference. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
"Paul Clement and K&S represent the prison inmates seeking release in Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Brown, 564 U.S. 915,919 (2011) (distinguishing “general or all-purpose jurisdiction, and specific or case-linked jurisdiction”. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
Brown involved the identical situation to Battaia, with the identical result. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:24 am by Blog Editorial
Following the High Court decision that the maximum time that a person can be held in police detention is 96 hours, including time spent on police bail (unless there is new evidence justifying further arrest), and the Government plan to introduce emergency legislation to reverse the decision, the Supreme Court has issued the following ruling: “On 30 June 2011 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom granted permission to appeal in this case and the appeal will be heard on 25 July by… [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 10:15 pm
"  Although the Supreme Court permits  many more First Amendment limitations on school grounds than off, Hazelwood School Dist. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 10:54 am by Samuel Cohen
First, the recent group litigation case of Various Claimants v Morrison Supermarkets PLC (case citation number: [2018] EWCA Civ 2339), which centred upon a rogue employee’s misuse of personal data, included evidence and judicial comment on the nature and adequacy of Morrison’s data security policies and procedures. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
The court Circuit in Pickup v Brown , 728 F.3d 1042 (9thCir., 2013) upheld a California law banning sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) on the ground that the therapy, though almost entirely talk-oriented, operated as conduct and thus fell outside a stricter First Amendment analysis. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:07 am by Rosalind English
These guidelines were challenged under Article 8  in the joined appeals R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police and R (Marper) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
But in teaching about this stuff, I've favored excerpts from the excellent, though lengthy Eyes on the Prize documentary, and I've also used the excellent (and rather accurate for such things) Brown v. [read post]