Search for: "Brown v. Mann" Results 1 - 20 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2015, 7:20 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Argument analysis: Justices dubious of government's broad reading of False Claims ActDear readers: I commend to you the excellent analysis by Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog of the oral argument held today at the Supreme Court in the case of Kellogg Brown and Root v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:52 am by Amy Howe
 Also at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Brian Netter covers this week’s grant in Integrity Staffing Solutions v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Now the False Claims Act case of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:02 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
 Carol Longenecker Schmidt and Kai Tate Mann won in State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann analyzed the decision for this blog; commentary comes from Hera Arsen at Ogletree Deakins and Archis Parasharami (and others) at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:17 am by Dan Markel
Sawyer,[1] to have helped ensure submission of the United States’ amicus brief in Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by David Bernstein
” Finally, MacLean seems to suggest the economist James Buchanan, the villain of the book, developed his “public choice” ideas in response to Brown v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:11 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Yam v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 2072 (05 October 2010) Zahid v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2158 (05 October 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) BBGP Managing General Partner Ltd & Ors v Babcock & Brown Global Partners [2010] EWHC 2176 (Ch) (20 August 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Brewer v Mann & Ors [2010] EWHC 2444 (QB) (05 October 2010) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Atwal… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:41 am by David Bernstein
Wednesday, I discussed how Nancy MacLean at best wildly exaggerated the influence of John Calhoun’s thought on modern libertarianism (further elaboration from Phil Magness here) and how she asserted that a libertarian author who praised Brown v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 12:07 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Wyatt Brown, No. 113,751 (Brown)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Kai Tate Mann[Vacated/remanded; Beier; March 1, 2019]Improper increase in sentence after successful appealOctober 24--Wednesday--a.m.State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, as do Jaeeun Shin and Dara Brown for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
In that case Mr Justice Mann went further and said that the Norwich Pharmacal principles should be applied flexibly to adapt to new and changing circumstances. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, we know as a matter of law that the Art.8 ECHR right to private life contains a right to reputation (Pfeifer v Austria). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann provided this blog’s preview; Dara Brown and Jaeeun Shin preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
With the sixtieth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The high profile privacy and data protection case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC continued before Mann J this week. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:09 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Olden v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 143 (26 February 2010) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Civ 158 (26 February 2010) LG, R (on the application of) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 142 (26 February 2010) Mann v Northern Electric Distribution Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 141 (26 February… [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 12:23 pm
Updating this ILB entry from August 18th, referencing the August 15th Court of Appeals ruling in the case of Rick Cook & Daniel Funk v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]