Search for: "Brown v. McConnell" Results 81 - 100 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
It’s especially galling that the court cloaked an attack on integration in the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment and the Brown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
 Buckley and Citizens United were well covered; a few added McConnell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 3:19 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Michael McConnell writes: “Such is the moral authority of [Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
” In an op-ed in the New York Times, Michael McConnell argues that the court’s three recent decisions on religious freedom (Espinoza v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
” Professor Avins and the Commission were convinced that Brown v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
  At the time this decision was rendered, the court was applying Askey v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Stephen Griffin
  In other words, a view overly flavored with contemporary values.Perhaps history did in fact turn out that way so that the “radical” Republicans won the day, as Michael McConnell in effect contended in his famous article on Brown. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:54 am by Jeff Gamso
Karl Keys offers one answer.Pending Executions February 4 Mark Brown* (Ohio)18 Robert Bryant Melson (Ala) 24 Hank Skinner* (Texas) February 2 Robert Lee McConnell (Nev)12 Dale Wayne Eaton (Wyo)Karl notes that the asterisks mean the execution is likely. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 9:31 pm
State & Michael Rippo v State, holding, respectively, that the state's so-called McConnell rule ("that it is unconstitutional to base an aggravating circumstance on the same felony upon which a felony murder is predicated") is retroactively applicable to all cases and subject to harmless-error analysis.As always, thanks for reading. - k [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm by Ilya Somin
As far back as 1973, Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:04 am by Stephen Wermiel
Some nominees have been more willing to discuss some past cases to a limited extent; almost all nominees discuss Brown v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
 Thus, in the 1991 case of Rust v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:20 pm by David Super
McConnell surely gives her a pass on inconsequential votes like this one. [read post]