Search for: "Brown v. Moore" Results 201 - 220 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 3:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
Even then, that's one session on the Suspension Clause and its historical understanding; one session on Brown v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
High Court to Weigh Warrantless Use of GPS in Non-Criminal Cases - bit.ly/wZTp7P (Theresa Marangas, Benjamin Neidl) Open Records and FOIA – Pushing Government Technology into the 21st Century - bit.ly/xv2Ulg (Heidi Maher) Patel v Unite – Order For Investigation of Deleted Internet Forum - bit.ly/xsuqj7 (Chris Dale) Perspective on Legal Search and Document Review – bit.ly/wfbqR0 (Ralph Losey) Policy vs. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am by Karwan Eskerie
Hurley and Moore v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWHC 201- read judgment This judgment, the latest in an expanding list of decisions on challenges to the Coalition government’s spending cuts, is an interesting example of judicial restraint and deference to the government on issues of macro-policy, at a time when the extent of judicial intervention into political decision-making is the subject of much debate in the legal profession and academia,… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
That seems to me to be a travesty of the true position which simply ignores the Browne Report and the extensive debate which took place inside and outside Parliament, both during the period when that investigation was being undertaken and subsequently when modifications to the Browne proposals were under consideration. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Peter Rost
Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, would be sending a letter of recommendation for Rost as well as several other candidates for the post. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
It featured: Paul Staines, Editor, ‘Guido Fawkes’; Jamie East, Managing Editor, ‘Holy Moly’; David Allen Green, ‘Jack of Kent’ blog and legal correspondent of the New Statesman; Richard Wilson, Blogger and tweeter, ‘Don’t Get Fooled’; Sir Christopher Meyer, Former Chairman of the PCC; Martin Moore, Director of the Media Standards Trust; Julian Petley, Chair of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom; John Kampfner, Index on… [read post]