Search for: "Brown v. Quarterman"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2014, 7:03 pm
The Ohio Supreme Court issued an opinion last week in State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:04 am
"Today, in Nelson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:39 pm
Quarterman is available. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 11:22 am
Brown ("federal court authority to overturn state judge's removal of a juror in a murder trial"), and the afternoon of Wednesday April 18 brings Panetti v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court prohibited the execution of the mentally retarded in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Quarterman
• US v. [read post]
26 Aug 2006, 7:31 am
A panel in Ryan Dickson v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
s reliance on our decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
Quarterman -- constitutionality of executing a death row inmate who has a delusion about why he is being executed Mon., April 23 06-562 -- U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:50 am
(For upcoming transnational cases, see below.)Yesterday's plurality opinion invalidating programs designed to maintain racially integrated public schools relied on Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
Quarterman, 550 U. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Quarterman, 127 S. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Fell Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
[09/22] Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:30 am
Quarterman, for instance, Justice Stevens wrote for the Court, reaffirming the long line of cases following Penry v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
Nathaniel Quarterman, Case No. 05-70008.] [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Quarterman, No. 09-70013 In a capital murder case, the denial of Defendant's motions for a stay of execution and appointment of counsel for clemency purposes is affirmed, where: 1) there was no habeas petition pending, and therefore the District Court had no jurisdiction to enjoin the execution; and 2) there was no showing of additional evidence that could be presented in clemency proceedings. . [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Quarterman, No. 06-20764 The prohibition against successive section 2254 petitions does not require a prisoner to challenge all judgments from a single court in a single habeas petition. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Quarterman, No. 03-20401 "Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital murder case is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) trial counsel provided ineffective representation; and 2) jury instructions given at the sentencing phase of his trial violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Penry v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
