Search for: "Brown v. Rogers"
Results 1 - 20
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
Brown was argued before the Fourth Circuit en banc. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during February 2024 Nine consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 including: Procedure Churchyards and burials Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Also included are: Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
For Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:59 am
Judge Judith Rogers wrote for the majority on the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am
He appeared in many of the leading defamation cases over a period of over 40 years, including the case of Irving v Penguin Books [2000] EWHC QB 155 and McDonalds v Steel [1997] EWHC QB 366. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court, Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit’s 1989 decision in Rogers v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
The logic of Rehnquist’s 1993 memo would seem to be in tension with landmark Supreme Court cases such as the Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:34 pm
Twitter and Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
Brown v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:54 am
In Murray v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Wayland Brown 19. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which held that the toy was protected under the reasoning of Rogers v. [read post]
