Search for: "Brown v. Rogers" Results 21 - 40 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
In Aviva Insurance Limited v Roger George Brown [2011] EWHC 362 QB, Mr Justice Eder was asked to consider a claim by Aviva for the recovery of sums it had paid to an insured under a home insurance policy (the Policy) on the basis that the paid claims were fraudulent.The factsThe Defendant, Mr Brown, made claims under the Policy for subsidence of his property in 1989 and 1996. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:21 am by Ronald Collins
A three-judge district court, in an opinion by Judge Janice Rogers Brown, upheld the law over a First Amendment challenge. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:24 pm by Barry Sookman
The issue was resolved earlier today by the Supreme Court in Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  As the Ninth Circuit has already held in Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Circuit, Janice Rogers Brown’s concurrence in Gross v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 3:23 am by Jane Chong
Circuit Judges David Tatel, Janice Rogers Brown, and A. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:45 pm
This time it was from Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the D.C. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) As to the use of “so help me God” in the 2009 oath, and the clergy prayers in 2009, the panel (Judge Janice Rogers Brown, joined by Judge Douglas Ginsburg) held the challenge was moot; as to the challenge to similar elements in the 2013 and 2017 inaugurations, the Court found lack of standing, on non-redressability grounds. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:28 am
Billy Preston minus Syreeta equals concurring opinion mention: A one paragraph concurring opinion that Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown issued today begins:An old song laments that "nothing from nothing leaves nothing. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 9:07 pm by Walter Olson
Paul to buckle in housing-disparate-impact case [Kevin Funnell] Justice Janice Rogers Brown: we can dream, can't we? [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
“An important win for property owners”: Supreme Court rules 8-0 that protected species habitat doesn’t include tracts containing no actual dusty gopher frogs and not inhabitable by them absent modification [Roger Pilon, George Will, earlier on Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
The Court of Appeals' Sept.. 2nd opinion in the case of In Ronald Sanders, Paul Hardin, Dallas Kelp, et al. v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
A new Cato podcast with Jay Richards and Caleb Brown explores the relationship between economic and religious liberty. [read post]