Search for: "Brown v. Rogers"
Results 81 - 100
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2010, 12:50 am
In Lloyds Bank plc v Rogers ([1996] EWCA Civ 1277), Simon Brown LJ noted that “The correctness of Hilbery J’s decision in Davidson has been doubted and never yet tested. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The House of Lords in the British Broadcasting Corporation case [2010] 1 AC 145 appeared to be in no doubt that Article 8 conferred a right to reputation that must be balanced, in an appropriate case, against the rights conferred by Article 10: see Lord Hope at [22] and [28] and Lord Brown at [69]. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:44 am
” And as much as no one wants to be compared to the Cleveland Browns, the recent, related cases of Pullen v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:05 am
Yesterday in Priests for Life v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 8:20 pm
Johnson: Trademark use Within an Expressive Work Must Only Pass the Rogers test, Not a Likelihood of Confusion Analysis: Mil-Spec Monkey v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
– Dallas attorney David Gair of Gray Reed on the firm’s blog, Texas Tax Talk Brown University’s Graduate Assistant Decision Under Challenge . . . [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:55 am
Roger Fernandes was born and raised in the Seattle area and studied Art at the University of Washington. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
It won’t surprise long-time readers to learn that I approve of Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:59 am
I join Caleb Brown at the Cato Daily Podcast to talk about federalism and the lead role of the states in applying pandemic-related police power. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:01 am
Miller v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
The logic of Rehnquist’s 1993 memo would seem to be in tension with landmark Supreme Court cases such as the Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
Brown. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown in Hettinga v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
I’ll note at the outset that of course this broadly remedial rationale for the legality of its discrimination is not being urged by the University of Texas (making it unlikely that the Court could invoke it), that adopting it would also require the Court to toss aside a lot of case law (including, as discussed below, Brown v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am
The en banc panel includes Judges Merrick Garland, Karen LeCraft Henderson, Judith Rogers, David Tatel, Janice Rogers Brown, Thomas Griffith, and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:01 pm
Only one case merits our discussion:Hutchinsion v State. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:25 am
One hopes that, 55 years after Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:53 am
Oddly -- or not -- Judge Janice Rogers Brown didn't join Judge Judith Rogers's opinion, opting instead to concur in the judgment only. [read post]
