Search for: "Brown v. Secretary of State"
Results 61 - 80
of 722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 1:00 pm
"Said Justice Elena Kagan in today's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:38 am
Brown, and William J. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:59 am
Brown (2014) 229 Cal. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
The Supreme Court has announced that judgment in the joined cases of WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18 November 2010, will be handed down on Wednesday 23 March 2011. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm
Brown (Tribal-State Gaming Compacts)Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm
Brown (Tribal-State Gaming Compacts)Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
” Even under such authority, the Secretary cannot base exclusion upon the alien’s “past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations … [that] would be lawful within the United States,” unless “the Secretary of State personally determines that the alien’s admission would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
Brown. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
’”’” (Quesada, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 308, quoting Brown v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm
Pollack (Cultural Resources; National Historic Preservation Act; Tribal Consultation) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html J.P. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:28 am
The leading authority on this, Maaouia v France (39652/98) (2001) 33 EHRR 42 ECHR establishes this beyond doubt and it is reflected in domestic law by cases like MNM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2000) INLR 576 IAT. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (o.t.a) v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am
It did, however, grant a declaration that in reaching that decision, the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills had failed fully to comply with his public sector equality duties. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Valeo (1976), and what it reaffirmed in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
