Search for: "Brown v. State Highway Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 6:52 pm
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
” Justice Sotomayor, writing in dissent, argued that the majority undermined the promise of racial equality at the heart of Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:30 am
The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ RightWilliams v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Whren v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
” After Axon Enterprise acquired a competitor, it found itself subjected to antitrust review by the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
” The state has designated Oklahoma v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s divided opinions in June Medical Services v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
” Indeed, prior to Little Rock, Eisenhower had been reluctant to lend federal muscle to desegregation efforts in the South in the years following the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am
This is when a board or commission applies the law to a set of specific facts. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Brown, County Attorney, Hauppauge, NY (Leonard G. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Similarly, in Hall v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
The Sixth District, in The Highway 68 Coalition v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:43 pm
THE DROUGHT: Governor Brown’s Executive Order calling for a 25% reduction in the State’s water usage will impact not only daily life for Californians (there goes that ten-minute shower), but potentially development proposals. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:43 pm
THE DROUGHT: Governor Brown’s Executive Order calling for a 25% reduction in the State’s water usage will impact not only daily life for Californians (there goes that ten-minute shower), but potentially development proposals. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
The Court denied cert. in one-time relist Brown v. [read post]
