Search for: "Brown v. Terris" Results 21 - 40 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm by INFORRM
In the second part of this post Amber Melville-Brown concludes her round up of the current privacy state of play across the continent with particular reference to Max Mosley’s forthcoming Strasbourg case. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm by Terry Lenamon
  Terry Lenamon’s List of Major United States Supreme Court Death Penalty Cases:Furman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Jeralyn
A class action lawsuit challenging the stop and frisks, Floyd v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am by Reuel Schiller
Even if the California courts didn’t wish to go that far (this was, after all, three years before Brown v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm by Joe Patrice
[Talking Points Memo] https://www.scribd.com/doc/253504322/Terry-Hendrix-NFL-Lawsuit [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably will not… [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 12:35 pm
Bey, No. 17-2945, the Court reverses the denial of a motion to suppress, holding that while officers acted within the authority conferred by Terry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Brown that antitrust review would impermissibly strip states of their autonomy. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Briefly:  California has announced that it is unlikely that it will be able to comply with the reductions to its prison population ordered by a three-judge panel and upheld by the Court in its 2011 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:06 am
Terry-Crespo (C.A.9, 2004), 356 F.3d 1170, 1177, discussing U.S. v. [read post]