Search for: "Brown v. Walker" Results 61 - 80 of 436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Take Constance Baker Motley, an African-American woman who spent a long legal career with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, litigating desegregation cases (including Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:12 pm by Maureen Johnston
Reynolds Tobacco Company v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am by Laura Sandwell
In Courtroom 1 from Monday 31 October Lords Hope, Walker, Clarke, Dyson and Collins will hear Lehman Brothers International v CRC Credit Fund Limited and GLC Investments PLC Sub Fund – European Equity Fund over four days. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:54 am
Walker Adobe Systems Incoporated v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:58 am by Rosalind English
Re W (Children) [2010] UKSC 12 SC (Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr) March 3 2010 The facts of this case are set out in the report of the Court of Appeal judgment below. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:54 pm by Dale Carpenter
Browning Courthouse in San Francisco, California. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Laura Sandwell
This week the Supreme Court will hear Russell and others v Transocean International Resources Limited (Scotland) over two days commencing on Wednesday 26 October by Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Laura Sandwell
This week the Supreme Court will hear Russell and others v Transocean International Resources Limited (Scotland) over two days commencing on Wednesday 26 October by Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:15 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Cara Perry, No. 109,506 (Brown)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Carol Longenecker SchmidtImproper classification of precursor severity level State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
. § 19.1     Generally The Case: Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
Supreme Court judgment (i) Construction of Schedule 1 A five-justice panel of Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown Mance and Wilson unanimously dismissed the appeal, despite adopting slightly different positions on the correct construction of the Schedule 1 provision. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
  This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
The majority of the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown and Mance) opted for a purposive interpretation of Part IV, Schedule 1 of the Act. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
§ 19.1     Generally The Case: Brown v. [read post]