Search for: "Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. NLRB"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2022, 2:57 pm
After the comment period, the NLRB issued the final rule in 2020, reversing the NLRB’s groundbreaking decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB 1599 (2015) (BFI), which held an employer could be considered a joint employer as long as it exercised “indirect control” over working conditions or had “reserved authority” to do so. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
In Browning-Ferris Industries of California Inc.,[1] the Obama board in 2015 upended the existing case law by finding that a company contracting for services could be deemed a joint employer of the service provider’s employees if the company indirectly exercised control over the employment terms/conditions through the contractor or merely reserved that right to control — even though it might not have been exercised. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Circuit recently reminded the agency in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:38 am
Circuit’s focus on common-law principles in its recent decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:51 am
The Court of Appeals accepted the case and recently issued a decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm
The National Labor Relations Board has made good on its recent promise to move forward with rulemaking to re-establish the decades-old joint employer standard in place prior to the Board’s 2015 decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (Browning-Ferris or BFI), petition for review docketed Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal.… [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
California “gig” workers may be. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:30 am
In the case of Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. (2015) NLRB No. 672 (“BFI”), BFI retained the services of Leadpoint Business Services (“LBS”) to provide staff to one of BFI’s recycling facilities. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm
California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) also sets forth law regarding California’s wage and hour requirements. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Employers are anticipating that the new Board and General Counsel will reform the following Obama-era precedents: Browning-Ferris Indus. of California, et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Employers are anticipating that the new Board and General Counsel will reform the following Obama-era precedents: Browning-Ferris Indus. of California, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
” The bill (H.R. 3441), which has bipartisan support, would toss the standard articulated in the NLRB’s recent Browning-Ferris Industries decision and clarify that two or more employers must have “actual, direct, and immediate” control over employees to be considered joint employers. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:37 am
” Predates Browning Ferris. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:42 am
Ever since the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued its August 2015 decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., holding two entities may be joint employers if one exercises either direct or indirect control over the terms and conditions of the other’s employees or reserves the right to do so, the concept of joint employment has generated increased interest from plaintiffs’ attorneys, and increased… [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:50 pm
On March 9, 2017, the United States Circuit Court for the District of Columbia heard oral argument in the case entitled Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a/ Browning-Ferris Newby Island Recyclery v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:25 pm
The case on appeal is entitled Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a/ Browning-Ferris Newby Island Recyclery v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:12 pm
In that case, Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:12 pm
In that case, Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 12:14 pm
La decisión: El 27 de agosto de 2015, en Browning-Ferris Industries of California Inc., et al. v. [read post]
