Search for: "Bruce Ackerman"
Results 81 - 100
of 427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2008, 1:50 am
PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION: This Bruce Ackerman piece seems pretty thinly sourced. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
Bruce Ackerman: The Lawless Presidency. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:02 pm
Still, if like me you thought the Constitution requires something more than a heads-up on this kind of thing, two recent pieces by Professors Bruce Ackerman and Oona Hathaway will be of interest. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:14 am
Bruce Ackerman makes some important points that make this worth five minutes of your time (depending on your billing rate, I suppose). [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:26 am
For the symposium on Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American RepublicStephen GardbaumBruce Ackerman’s The Decline and Fall of the American Republic is a profoundly important constitutional wake-up call. [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
What kind of transformation we would get, of course, would depend on the politics of the incoming President (Giuliani, McCain or Romney) and on the particular type of Justices he appoints.So who has a better theory of constitutional transformations, Bruce Ackerman or Sandy and myself? [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
Bruce Ackerman (Yale), The Constitutional Critiques of Elizabeth Warren’s Wealth Tax Plan Are Absurd Axios, Filthy Rich, Owing No Tax Baker Institute for Public Policy, Fiscal Federalism and the State and Local Tax Deduction Limit Bloomberg, Democrats Embrace Tax-the-Rich Label After Years of Ducking It Bloomberg, How High-Tax Countries Tax... [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:21 am
Last year, Bruce Ackerman and I made a similar argument. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:25 am
Bruce Ackerman of Yale, via Stirling Newberry at KOS. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:01 pm
In the past year, Slate has run stories by Bruce Ackerman, Ahkil Amar, Frank Bowman, Bill Eskridge, David Fontana, Richard Thompson ... [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:02 am
” Begins with Edward Abbey and Bruce Ackerman, and concludes with Aaron Zelman. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:16 pm
Anybody interested in reading the full text of our "originalist" brief should go to https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx and then search for the name "Bruce Ackerman". [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 7:32 am
Aziz Huq, Alison LaCroix Write About Institutional Checks on Trump qbaron Fri, 01/17/2025 - 09:32 Read more about Aziz Huq, Alison LaCroix Write About Institutional Checks on Trump Project Syndicate Daron Acemoglu Bruce Ackerman Aziz Huq Alison L. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:54 am
Jack Balkin's wonderful discussions of Professor Bruce Ackerman's theory of Constitutional Moments and Balkin's onw theory of Constitutional amendment by partisan entrenchment before, but Balkin has added two posts to the materials and they are even better. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:21 am
Bruce Ackerman has an interesting piece in the Financial Times, here (subscription apparently required) and here, raising questions about the propriety of the Bush administration's reliance on active-duty military officers to make the case for sustaining the escalation in Iraq. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:35 pm
Yale Law School Professor Bruce Ackerman, former Army vice chief of staff General Jack Keane, and Brigadier General H. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:38 pm
In addition to more deeply engaging his ongoing debate with Bruce Ackerman, the updated paper also responds to an intervention in the debate from Eric Posner and Adrian Vermeule. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
WaPo’s WonkBlog: “On Friday, I noted that a number of campaign finance experts, including Yale’s Bruce Ackerman and Ian Ayres and Harvard’s Larry Lessig, support a voucher system in which every eligible voter has a $50 voucher or tax credit to donate to a campaign of his or her choice. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:41 am
Bruce Ackerman is confident that the Justices blinked and that they will affirm Section 5's constitutionality when the inevitable next case reaches the Court.As I explain on Rick Hasen's blog, I have my doubts. [read post]
Lawprof Bruce Ackerman says we should require Senate approval of senior White House staff positions.
11 Mar 2009, 2:20 am
"The challenge is to make it difficult for future presidents to appoint less-qualified officials -- such as Alberto Gonzales or Harriet Miers -- without serious outside review of their credentials. [read post]