Search for: "Bruce Schneier" Results 81 - 100 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2008, 9:53 am
Bruce Schneier explains What Our Top Spy Doesn't Get: Security and Privacy Aren't Opposites ... [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:37 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Bruce Schneier pointed out on his blog Friday this video by a German TV show in which a physicist demonstrates how a full body scanner didn't catch the bomb-making components that he had hidden on his body. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:48 pm by Adam Thierer
” and it’s a short review of Bruce Schneier’s latest book, Liars & Outliers: Enabling the Trust that Society Needs to Thrive. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 5:27 pm
She also links to Bruce Schneier, on "Stabbing People with Stuff you canGeThrough Airport Security" (hint: think obsidian). [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 6:39 am
Wired - “How Does Bruce Schneier Protect His Laptop Data? [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 4:53 am
After the Texas Department of Public Safety spent millions revamping its drivers license database to be able to use facial recognition technology, and the Legislature removed all restrictions for police use of the data, via Bruce Schneier we now discover the technology works quite poorly. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 8:42 pm
Bruce Schneier links to a campaign that wants people to tell politicians to stop being afraid. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:42 am by Cyrus Farivar
The project’s code has gone through a “detailed security audit” (PDF) by a team from the University of Washington, which also included Bruce Schneier and Jacob Appelbaum (Tor developer and renowned security researcher). [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:29 pm
Schneier on Security: The War on the Unexpected The War on the Unexpected We've opened up a new front on the war on terror. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 2:10 pm
Bruce Schneier is a rare breed of security expert: someone who understand the math and technology of modern day security, but who also understands the other key element, which is the human dynamic. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:37 am
Bruce Schneier links to a paper from HotSec that argues strong passwords accomplish little; instead, stronger user IDs and limits on log-in attempts are better solutions. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 7:37 pm
In another installment of the disturbingly frequent series of posts which only advert to things I would write about at more length if I had more time, I present for your approval this extremely interesting article from Bruce Schneier via Wired.com. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 6:52 pm by David
 ~ Bruce Schneier   Welcome to an Internet without Privacy © 2007-2013 by the authors of Popehat. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
One of my favorite security gurus, Bruce Schneier, has an entertaining and yet infuriating article on The Security Mindset in which he tries to explain how security professionals think differently from other engineers. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:04 am by Andres
This is the powerful conclusion reached by security guru Bruce Schneier in this brilliant op-ed for CNN. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:53 am by John Gregory
Some people – notably information security expert Bruce Schneier – believe that if IT suppliers, notably software providers, were civilly liable for the harm caused by buggy products, they would have an incentive to be more careful. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:03 am
Via Bruce Schneier, (where as always the comments are excellent, including to one that pointed to this article on creation of false memories), I was happy to see our neighbors to the west in New Mexico are pushing for reforms in eyewitness identification procedures used by police investigators to ensure greater accuracy. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:33 am by marcorandazza
Bruce Schneier writes: The truth is that exactly two things have made air travel safer since 9/11: reinforcing cockpit doors and convincing passengers they need to fight back. [read post]
Study: Towards A User Centric Policy Framework” with Berkman community members Josephine Wolff, Andy Ellis, and Bruce Schneier, who participated in the study. [read post]