Search for: "Bruce v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2007, 7:08 am
Now we have David Skeel and Bruce Mann—a big improvement. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So is Bruce Ackerman’s dualist theory. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:57 pm
Representing Appellee State: Bruce A. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
United States applies retroactively. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
This would not be possible without the hard work of our multi-state team composed of Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Bruce Buchanan and myself, John Gihon. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
It's an obligation when they take that oath to faithfully uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. . . . [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
President Clinton on numerous occasions averred that the United States was not at war. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
Our explanation of the New Deal transformation is that the public kept reelecting Franklin Roosevelt to the White House and Democrats to the Senate, so that Roosevelt was able to replace eight Justices by the time the Court decided United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United Fabricare Supply, Inc. v. 3Hanger Supply Company, Inc., 2012 WL 2449916 (C.D. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
Our second new relist is Bruce v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  As part of the guilty plea, Lin agreed to forfeit approximately $25,000 as well as an additional $145,000 in connection with her resolution of the government’s forfeiture verdict in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 pm by Bruce Zagaris
  As part of the guilty plea, Lin agreed to forfeit approximately $25,000 as well as an additional $145,000 in connection with her resolution of the government’s forfeiture verdict in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
Representing Appellee: Bruce A. [read post]