Search for: "Brussel v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm
In the future, the United Kingdom as a state will no longer benefit from the benefits of the European Judicial Area; the UK will rather be a third country. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:54 am
After the Council reviewed the Commission Proposal, the exequatur was removed along with the distinction between enforceable title in the Member State of origin and in the Member State of enforcement. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
At the turn of the year, the doors to the UK’s participation in the Recast Brussels I Regulation and the 2007 Lugano Convention closed. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:38 am
There is no Border Detention Order in the United Kingdom. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm
Simultaneously, the defendants filed a suit in the United States District Court, asserting non-infringement of the plaintiffs’ rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:28 am
Circuit Has recently faced in the dispute between Spanski Enterprises v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:41 pm
Over the years, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of patent cases, which is reflective of how important some controversies in that field of law are. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Over at the Times, President Jimmy Carter urges states involved in the Syrian conflict to push for a political solution and calls for five-way negotiations between the United States, Turkey, Russia, Iran, and the Syrian regime. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
It considers how the test is applied by national trade mark registries across EU member states, by the EUIPO, by national courts, and by the CJEU. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:06 am
That's all the proposed amendment to the statute would do: it wouldn't even import anything into patent law any more than you couldn import the Statue of Liberty into the United States: what's already there can't be imported. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:36 am
This is what happens in the United States where state defamation law has been eclipsed by federal free-speech law (the First Amendment). [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:24 am
”A series of serious crimes widely described as “heinous” occurred in 1993 during the administration of President Fidel V. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:11 am
Security Council at the United States’ urging, the Council deemed the missile launch a “violation of Security Council resolution(s). [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
The present article analyses the reception of the ECJ cases by courts of the member states. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:41 pm
There'll be a spectacular Epic Games v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am
Qualcomm's motion mentions complaints by Apple in the same district (Southern District of California) and "in the United Kingdom, China, Japan, and Taiwan. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:01 am
In 1845, after moving from Paris to Brussels, Marx wrote his eleven Theses on Feuerbach, best known for Thesis 11, which states that “philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways, the point is to change it. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 11:11 pm
After the Epic Games v. [read post]
