Search for: "Bryant v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2010, 9:16 am
 in his capacity as the commissioner of correction, and others in her action for the wrongful death of the decedent while he was incarcerated at Garner correctional institution in Newtown. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
Yates Letter to the Guardian Acting Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, John Yates yesterday wrote to the Guardian to refute allegations made by Chris Bryant that he misled the Home Affairs Select Committee over phone hacking. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 12 May 2011, the Administrative Court will hear the renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review by Lord Prescott, Chris Bryant MP and others (Queen (on the application of Bryant and ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court, Corrections and Apologies We are not aware of any statements in Open Court. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States HBO has successfully defended a defamation lawsuit brought by Mitre Sports over a Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel report on child labour in India. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 09738-21 Woodcock v Huddersfield Daily Examiner, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09739-21 Woodcock v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigatio 09740-21 Woodcock v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09741-21 Woodcock v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09742-21… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
On 6 December 2022, Labour MP Chris Bryant gave the Hacked Off annual “Leveson Lecture”. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection John Edwards, the Information Commissioner, has opened an investigation into concerns that the Ministry of Justice itself was unlawfully processing barristers’ personal data. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]