Search for: "Bryant v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
The United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am
Bryant. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 6:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 6:40 am
This is one of them.The case is Bryant v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 9:03 am
In Barr v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:19 am
In this article, Bryant v Parkland School Division, 2021 ABQB 391, a case in which the plaintiffs sought more money on termination than what their contracts provided, is discussed. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm
In its June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:14 pm
Bryant v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
TeleCheck Servs., Inc., 923 F. 3d 458, 469 (CA6 2019) ("Article III standing may draw a linebetween private and public rights"); Bryant v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:58 pm
First, he contended that the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Moore v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 6:01 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Kazadi Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of first degree murder and related offenses, Bryant Whitaker, appellant, presents for our review a single question: whether the court abused its discretion in “refusing to ask [certain] voir dire questions requested by the defense. [read post]
9 May 2021, 3:52 pm
This time the case is United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
