Search for: "Bubb v. Laws"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
Bubb v Wandsworth London Borough Council: [2011] EWCA Civ 1285; [2011] WLR (D) 323 “A county court judge hearing an appeal on a point of law under section 204 of the Housing Act 1996, against a review of whether a local housing authority owed a duty to a homeless person under the 1996 Act, had no jurisdiction to find the relevant primary facts for himself. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:34 am
Bubb, 130 N.J. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
Law Lessons from DEBORAH ANN WEISS V. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am
The EHRC, intervening, had argued that Bubb could not longer stand in view of R (CN) v Lewisham LBC (2014) UK SC 62; (2015) AC 1259, and the judgment of Lord Hodge at (71) “71. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:58 am
Law Lessons from Transworld Aggregate LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
Law Lessons from JOSEPH BEIM V. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:57 am
Bubb v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
A great recent paper by Ryan Bubb (NYU Law) and Alex Kaufman both suggests that they do and explains why. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
WWRD U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Law for the platform economy. [read post]
