Search for: "Buchanan v. Patterson"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Slip Op. 00274 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which granted Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC’s motion to fix the amount of its charging lien against plaintiff based upon an account stated, Nonparty respondent Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (BIR) submitted proof that it entered into a retainer agreement with plaintiff and sent her regular invoices to which she did not object during the course of the firm’s year-long engagement. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
Slip Op. 00274 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which granted Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC’s motion to fix the amount of its charging lien against plaintiff based upon an account stated, Nonparty respondent Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (BIR) submitted proof that it entered into a retainer agreement with plaintiff and sent her regular invoices to which she did not object during the course of the firm’s year-long engagement. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 2:23 pm
Beverwyk, Buchanan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
Beverwyk (2017), Buchanan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Haralson County Includes the cities of Bremen, Buchanan, Tallapoosa and Waco. [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 4:02 am
United States v. [read post]