Search for: "Buchanan v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
We (Buchanan and Dorf) Aren't the Ones Saying the President Should "Invoke" the Fourteenth Amendment
6 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
At most what they have shown is that if the President decides to prioritize paying bondholders while stiffing Social Security recipients, he will not thereby violate the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
"); Buchanan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
McCaul, a Republican from Texas, is the chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security and is reportedly eager to serve in the administration. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The Fallback ApproachThat question rests on the faulty premise that the administration must choose only one tactic. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Again, if the administration continues to be committed to its existing strategy, none of us should currently be any the wiser. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
The more interesting questions are why they did so and why this odd little case saw the return of the usual ideological split among the justices.The tax aspect of the case arises from the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937, which created a retirement system for railroad workers that was separate from the just-enacted Social Security system. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Ever since Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Many people acknowledge that Reagan would not be nearly conservative enough for today’s Republican Party, yet the press cannot resist labeling as “moderates” conservative extremists like Susan Collins (who actually believes, among other things, that tax cuts pay for themselves—and who claimed to believe that Brett Kavanaugh would not overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
What matters here is that, during the question-and-answer period, I pointed out that two of the categories—efficiency and administrability—are in fact empty concepts. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
The Reagan Administration sold weapons to Iran, ostensibly to secure the release of hostages, and then used the money from the arm sales to fund the Nicaraguan Contras. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
Kurzban.Kurzban, Ira J.Washington, DC : American Immigration Council, c2010.ImmigrationKFP81 .P4 NO.6361Immigration law forum 2010[Mechanicsburg, Pa.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2010.Intellectual PropertyKF3116 .P34 2010Patent obviousness in the wake of KSR International Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Biden administration argues Congress intended the provision as an anti-corruption measure. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
