Search for: "Buck v State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 8:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Professor Andrew Morriss suggests that we may have seen this dynamic in action in the Alabama legislature's response to LePage v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
The Keep Your Opinions to Yourself Award: Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita The Failed Sunshine State Award: Florida Gov. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  At the state level, in Virginia, the same 1924 legislative session originated both the eugenical sterizilization act at issue in Buck v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
"  A caller--self-described as a "mechanic," who came to Holmes by reading Louis Menand's Metaphysical Club--aptly asks whether the justice could fairly be described as result-oriented and whether Buck v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:00 am by Paul L. Singer
While most people recognize Epic Games as a COPPA case, Wiseman specifically pointed to the design choices regarding unauthorized charges of “V-bucks” where the company changed its “undo” button to be less prominent after testing revealed it would reduce consumer clicks. [read post]
In 1872, California bucked the common law and the views of many other states by declaring noncompete agreements unenforceable except in narrow and limited circumstances. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
 The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to answer that question in Corner Post v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  To begin with a quick clarification: the above quote is not Michelman’s own view, but a constructive challenge that he poses for those who are critical of state-centric conceptions of constitutional rights law. [read post]