Search for: "Buck v. California" Results 81 - 100 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2008, 10:17 pm
For one recent example of this see the Northern District of California case Yamagiwa v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
After the petitioner in Buck v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
 Because losing a million bucks or so seems way too onerous.But just losing merely the profits you obtained from that particular trip?! [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:16 am by David DePaolo
The California Third District Court of Appeals, in Ramirez v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Cockrell and Buck v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Jean Sternlight
A few decisions have bucked the general trend, for example refusing to apply Concepcion to prevent plaintiffs from bringing a Title VII pattern and practice claim collectively  or holding that claims brought under California’s Private Attorney General Act are  not enforceable, notwithstanding Concepcion. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
 In Bank Markazi v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:12 am
Interestingly, although the new right-exclusive remedy rule has been a staple of California jurisprudence for over 150 years (see, e.g., Russell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
” The Court also issued opinions in argued cases, including a decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:43 pm by Richard Hunt
The ADA may apply to app based businesses as well as these more recent articles: Court hits Uber and Lyft for ADA Violations, 2) National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]