Search for: "Buck v. Hill"
Results 21 - 40
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2021, 5:52 pm
After spending thousands of dollars, a trademark owner may end up with only partial relief – not enough bang for the bucks! [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
” In The George Washington Law Review, Robin Maher discusses last week’s decision in Buck v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 2:30 pm
In Harvey v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
” Briefly: At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy discusses Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion for the court this term in Buck v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
” The Court’s denial of certiorari in Buck v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 12:47 pm
In the recent case of Tucker v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:47 pm
” The case of ILARIS “may be another trigger for a fix to the priority voucher program as part of the PDUFA V reauthorization negotiations on Capitol Hill,” says The RPM Report. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm
The Second Circuit’s decision in Tilton creates unanimity among the circuit courts that have addressed the issue to date, although, as we previously reported, the Eleventh Circuit is likely to rule on the issue sometime this year in Hill v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
Roper, 11-5005, a habeas case that had been relisted twice, and Buck v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
Buck, 813 F.2d at 592. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:00 am
Riley v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Zarda, No. 17-1623, along with one from Georgia that came to the opposite conclusion, Bostock v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
Commentary comes from Neil Siegel at The Hill. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in FCC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
Privacy * Winston Smith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am
” In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh discusses Buck v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
” At Think Progress, Ian Millhiser and Carimah Townes discuss Buck v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Coverage of the grant in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:16 pm
My last post pointed to a Columbus Bar Association press release about Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
