Search for: "Buckley v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm by Jennifer Mascott
” The Lucia opinion suggests that this “continuing position” element — emphasized in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:42 pm by Jeffrey McCoy and Oliver Dunford
” Indeed, rulemaking was explicitly listed as a “significant authority” when that term was first used by the Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 1:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Buckley v City of New York, a police officer was accidentally shot in the leg when a gun being loaded by a fellow officer discharged in the station house locker room. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:36 am by John Jascob
Mark Perry, on behalf of Lucia, opened by stating that SEC ALJs are officers under all the Court's precedents. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
Bolton has also referred to federal campaign finance laws as an “overreact[ion]” to Watergate, and fought against them as counsel for the petitioners in Buckley v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
I sometimes show short movie clips at the start of lecture classes too- I have shown short clips of relevant sections of "Eyes on the Prize" in my Con Law class on Brown v Board and affirmative action/Bakke- not sure it can be streamed but usually your law library will have or can ILL the DVDs- and some "Firing Line" clips of William F Buckley debating the ERA (these are on YouTube), etc.Elizabeth Pleck: Loving v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Center for Competitive Politics, Luke Wachob “discusses three consequences of an America without the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Buckley v. [read post]