Search for: "Bull v. Bull"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2016, 3:08 am
See also Tuttle v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:35 am
More: NBC Washington; opinion in Tracey v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm
The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the 1989 decision of Mazzeo v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH (Case C-119/10); [2012] WLR (D) 20 “A service provider who, under an order from and on the instructions of another person, filled packaging which was supplied to it by the other person who, in advance, affixed to it a sign which was identical with, or similar to, a sign protected as a trade mark did not itself make use of the sign that was liable to be prohibited under that provision.” WLR Daily, 15th December 2012… [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 5:09 pm
Di Modica argues the addition—which stares down his bull—changes the message of his work and violates his copyright and moral rights. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:13 am
The case is titled Red Bull GMBH v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:20 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 73 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor [2013] UKSC 73 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:20 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 73 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor [2013] UKSC 73 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:32 am
Visual and conceptual similarity was also found in relation to Big Horn’s blue and silver geometric device and Red Bull’s blue and silver parallelogram device (using approximately the same colour distributions, with angular geometric shapes and central yellow sun element), and in relation to Big Horn’s single ram and Red Bull’s single bull mark.Link between the signs and the trade marks to constitute unfair advantageBacon QC took into account a… [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
In the case, Petrella v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:36 am
In Tracey v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:36 am
In Tracey v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:10 am
StreetCar ORV, LLC d/b/a American Expedition Vehicles v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
Along with Mr Storey, it is a defendant in a claim [IP-2019-000064] recently issued in the English High Court by Red Bull GmbH (RBG), owner of Haas' rival F1 team Red Bull Racing. [read post]
