Search for: "Bull v. Bull" Results 61 - 80 of 3,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
Red Bull energy drink has been around for a long time now. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
Red Bull energy drink has been around for a long time now. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Patent Docs
Practising Law Institute (PLI) will be offering a one-hour webcast entitled "Amgen v. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 8:06 pm by Patent Docs
Amgen from an ANDA litigator’s point of view The FDA Final MMA Rule Novartis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:34 am
RED DAWGRED BULLJane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Adam Johnson) Monster Energy Company v Red Bull GmbH [2022] EWHC 2155 (Ch) (12 Aug 2022)One of the grounds for opposing a trade mark is that it is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark that has a reputation in the United Kingdom and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:40 pm by Patent Docs
LexisNexis will be offering a luncheon and CLE presentation entitled: "The impact of Therasence v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:09 am by sally
Oxford City Council v Bull [2011] EWCA Civ 609; [2011] WLR (D) 169 “Where the father of children who resided with their mother, from whom he was separated, allowed them to share his one-room accommodation, he became homeless intentionally, within the meaning of section 191(1) of the Housing Act 1996, on being evicted from that accommodation. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:46 am by Laura Orr
In case you were wondering (and you were, weren’t you), the Oregon Supreme Court on April 1, 2010, decided:State of Oregon v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:28 pm by Patent Docs
The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) will offer a one-hour webinar entitled "Alice v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:10 am
We now have a five-year track record in which there have been no fish v. human water conflicts on the Bull Run and the federal services have, so far, agreed that these flow release levels are adequate. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of K and AC Jackson and Son) v DEFRA – read judgment. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 8:41 pm by Patent Docs
McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP will be offering a live webinar entitled "What are the Implications of CLS Bank Int'l v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 8:24 pm by Patent Docs
Strafford will be offering a webinar/teleconference entitled "Cuozzo v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 9:51 pm by Patent Docs
ACI faculty will offer presentations on the following topics: Regulatory and Legislative Developments Impacting the Biopharmaceutical Industry The Impact of Amgen v Sanofi on In-House Patenting Strategies The "Skinny Label" Post-GSK v Teva regarding Biosimilar Carve-Outs Litigation Strategies for Challenging Reference Drug Patents in IPRs APJs speaking on Practice, Policy, and Procedure… [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
I haven't read this new white paper yet from the Media Law Resource Center (it's about 200 pages long), but it seems quite interesting; here's the Table of Contents [UPDATE: link to paper fixed]: Preface iii Floyd Abrams Introduction and Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1: A Response to Justice Thomas 9 Matthew Schafer Chapter 2: A Response to Justice Gorsuch 79 Richard Tofel and Jeremy Kutner Chapter 3: The Empirical Reality… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:51 pm by Patent Docs
Among the presentations being offered at the annual meeting are: Recent case law developments; A look at patent landscaping and analysis; Legal issues surrounding genetic information research and development; Damages; Current state of the ITC; Patentability issues; Recent developments in patent offices around the world; and Ethical questions arising from en banc review of… [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 8:45 pm by Patent Docs
ACI faculty will provide insights into: Teva v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:50 pm by Patent Docs
Supreme Court Patent Case Law Update America Invents Act (AIA) Trial Proceedings Intellectual Property Valuation -- A Case Study Implementation of Section 101: Alice v. [read post]