Search for: "Burbige v Siben & Ferber"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 12:16 am
Siben & Ferber, NY Slip Op 07794 (2d Dept. 2011).Here is the decision.Tomorrow’s issue: Preliminary injunctions. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 2:52 am
We wonder if that's what happened in Burbige v Siben & Ferber ;2011 NY Slip Op 07794 ; Decided on November 1, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:06 am
The problem in Burbige v Siben & Ferber 2012 NY Slip Op 32086(U) July 30, 2012 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 010334/07 Judge: Randy Sue Marber is that there is no ladder. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:14 am
Siben & Ferber, NY Slip Op 07794 (2d Dept. 2011).Here is the decision.Monday’s issue: Preliminary injunctions. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
Here, there was no evidence that the plaintiff’s failure to disclose his damages expert was intentional or willful, and the prejudice to the defendants was alleviated by the Supreme Court’s conditional continuance of the trial to permit completion of expert disclosure along with the imposition of monetary sanctions (see Burbige v Siben & Ferber, 115 AD3d 632, 633, citing Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 289 AD2d… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 5:44 am
The law firm defendants’ submissions in support of their motion did not establish, prima facie, the absence of at least one element of the legal malpractice cause of action (see Burbige v Siben & Ferber, 152 AD3d 641, 642). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:41 am
” “Where an attorney’s motion to dismiss is premised on the argument that the client could not have succeeded on its underlying claim, the attorney must show that the plaintiff would have been unable to prove one of the essential elements of the claim (Burbige v Siben & Ferber, 152 AD3d 641, 642 [2d Dept 2017]; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d 674, 675 [2d Dept 2008]). [read post]
