Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 1 - 20 of 34,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The car owners in this case had argued that due process does give them a right to a prompt hearing under Mathews v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
For example, in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Furthermore, while most potential sanctions targets have probably already been analyzed by OFAC, the process of preparing a formal analysis of whether each person and entity not listed is eligible for listing is likely to be a significant burden on OFAC’s targeting staff. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In the First Department it is Defendants’ burden to demonstrate uncollectability of a judgment as a defense; in the Second Department it is Plaintiff’s burden. [read post]