Search for: "Burden v. North Dakota" Results 101 - 120 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2008, 10:05 pm
North Dakota and the much maligned physical presence test for tax nexus. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:30 am by George Mundstock
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), and avoid collecting use tax on sales so as to achieve a practical 5 to 10% price advantage. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:01 pm by Jeanette Moffa
North Dakota, the United States Supreme Court made it very clear that physical presence must be required by a vendor for it to have nexus within a state. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:47 am by Susan Brenner
A North Dakota district court judge did essentially the same thing in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by John Wester and Emma Kutteh
The design of the class action covered consumers in Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, New Mexico, Maine, Minnesota, Michigan, South Dakota, Utah, California, Iowa, North Dakota, and West Virginia. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Even if Minnesota claimed that pollution emitters in North Dakota were harming the state, Minnesota couldn't hale the North Dakota emitters to court. [read post]
California, North Dakota and Maine explicitly prohibit compensation for delivering a ballot on behalf of a voter. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
But some states — when I last checked, Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota and Utah — still recognize the alienation of affections tort; and at least North Carolina still recognizes the criminal conversation tort. [read post]