Search for: "Burden v. North Dakota" Results 141 - 160 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 8:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Numerous challenges against the WOTUS rule are pending in courts around the country, including one in North Dakota I covered here. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:51 am
This North Dakota law clearly runs afoul of the current “undue burden” test as it would prohibit some abortions before fetal viability. [read post]
This opposition—rooted in concerns over states’ rights and the Constitution—will take center stage in coming months in four lawsuits originating in Texas, Georgia, Ohio, and North Dakota. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
North Dakota, 14-973, a summertime sequel. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Tatum 14-656Issue: (1) Whether the plaintiff bears the burden of proving loss causation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
North Dakota 14-973Issue: Whether or under what circumstances police officers conduct a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when they trespass in common areas of locked apartment buildings to look for evidence of criminal activity. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:30 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 40614 (D ND, March 30, 2015), a North Dakota federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:03 am by LTA-Editor
North Dakota, that the “negative” or “dormant” Commerce Clause prohibits a state from requiring an out-of-state retailer with no physical in-state presence to collect the state’s sales or use tax. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:06 am by Ronald Mann
It just says that North Dakota cannot make amazon.com collect the tax. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Both Hamms worked at Continental Resources, an oil company that was in the process of leasing huge swaths of land in North Dakota, Montana, and Canada. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]