Search for: "Burford v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
Defendants’ Burford abstention argument was rejected because: the Defendants have not made a strong showing of the coherent state policies or highly complex, unsettled state law issues required for Burford abstention; and the Sixth Circuit has expressly rejected the very cases that Defendants rely on. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:24 pm by Patricia Salkin
Pulte Home Corporation v Montgomery County, Maryland, 2015 WL 4430588 (D. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 8:15 am
"  The district court abstained, under Burford v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:09 pm by Patricia Salkin
Defendants first moved that the Court abstain from exercising jurisdiction over this case under Burford v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am by Peter Mahler
In most instances, the federal courts have abstained from hearing those cases under the prong of Burford abstention deferring to state efforts to establish a uniform development and interpretation of the statutory scheme governing state-created entities. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
" The district court declined to hear the case, dismissing the federal constitutional challenges to the two South Carolina statutes regulating video poker, on the ground that Burford v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:44 am by Anonymous
  The vacancy was created by the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia last year on February 13, 2016.Born in Denver, Colorado, he moved to Washington, D.C. when his mother, Anne Gorsuch Burford, was appointed as the first female head of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:10 am
Posted by William Magnuson, Texas A&M Law School, on Wednesday, September 13, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Banks, Bitcoin, Crowdfunding, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial reporting, Financial technology, Innovation, International governance, Market efficiency, Moral hazard, SIFIs, Systemic risk OCC Stakes Out a Lead Role in Establishing New… [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
” The decision does not mention Burford abstention or otherwise indicate if the defendants argued Burford abstention as an alternative basis for dismissal. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]