Search for: "Burgess v. Burgess" Results 181 - 200 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
O'Brien & Burgess raises a technical question involving application of a sentencing enhancement for use of a machine gun in a crime. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:06 am by Daniel Richardson
By David RangavizIn re Kimmick, 2013 VT 43Today’s case is about the scope of the right to counsel.This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Gideon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant's contention based on People v Burgess and People v Cureton is that his designation as a level three sex offender violated his right to due process because the prosecution failed to offer any evidence at the determination hearing is unpreserved for appellate review. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
 In addition to my April 17 review of the Supreme Court's  Baze lethal injection case, here is a brief overview of some additional critical criminal appellate decisions from this  week:  - In Burgess v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 2:48 am by Katherine A. Campbell and Siobhan Hayes
Doing no work but hoping to claim was not a successful strategy for the landlord in the case of Car Giant Limited and Acredart Limited v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hammersmith. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
We'd like to comment upon this post at The Florida Legal Blog, but unfortunately, we are too scared, as it profiles Internet Solutions Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:55 am by Erin Miller
O’Brien and Burgess (08-1569) — trial findings on a weapon that triggers a higher criminal sentence Wednesday, February 24: Carr v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, there is now uniformity among the Federal Courts of Appeals, which have held that pursuant to section 541(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a claim which arose after the filing of a bankruptcy petition belongs to the debtor and not the estate (Davidkin v Rizzuto, 55 Misc 3d 528 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2017]; see Cadle Co. v Schlichtmann, 267 F3d 14 [1st Cir 2001], cert denied 535 US 1018 [2002]; In re Jackson, 593 F3d 171 [2d Cir 2010]; In re Majestic Star… [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Jeff Fisher will argue Burgess v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:00 am by Janet Lindenmuth
“Life and Character of Jacob Broom,” Historical and Biographical Papers of the State of Delaware, v. 5 (1909) Drescher, Nuala M. [read post]