Search for: "Burk v. Oklahoma"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm
By: Loyd Willaford and Sarah Burke In Kopf v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:25 am
"The state Chamber of Commerce is dismayed, telling WorkCompCentral they are "disappointed" though reviewing options.The lead attorney in all of the constitutional challenges, Bob Burke, has been prolific in filing appeals and communicating with community, sending email status updates and blogging regularly about Oklahoma workers' compensation nearly since the day after Senate Bill 1062 was passed.He says the state Supreme Court "spoke volumes" about… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:30 am
The idea or concept of "public policy protections" was emphasized in the historic Oklahoma case, Burk v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:04 pm
In Colony Insurance Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:30 pm
") As he did so, Burk told his neighbor, 23-year-old Jerome Dewayne Whyte, that Whyte was "just a trick. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:12 am
Fletcher v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
The Oklahoma Supreme Court created a narrow “public policy” exception to the employment-at-will doctrine, referred to as a Burk tort. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
It's a tale of contrasts in this morning's WorkCompCentral News.There's joy and elation within the "opt-out" crowd that the Oklahoma Supreme Court denied taking on original jurisdiction in the constitutional challenge to that state's recent reform law, and in particular the option employers have to provide alternatives to The System.Those challenging the law are more circumspect, saying that the court's decision at this time wasn't not expected and… [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Oklahoma, which asks whether Oklahoma had jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by an Indian within the historical boundaries of the Creek reservation in eastern Oklahoma, for this blog. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:18 am
Nor could the employee convince the court to revive his claim that his termination violated Oklahoma state law and was prohibited by Burk v K-Mart Corp. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:57 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that found former members of the landmark Dukes v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:31 am
Rptr. 122 (Cal.App. 2d Dist. 1979); Burk Royalty Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:52 pm
Rptr. 122 (Cal.App. 2d Dist. 1979); Burk Royalty Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
Arizona and the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:30 am
in the same database, the most-recent-on-top results put the case I needed at 59 out of 69… For comparison, I plugged my “wrongful discharge public policy exception” search into Google Scholar (having selected only Oklahoma cases), and Burk v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
I, Jackson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
http://j.st/GZJ Wyoming v. [read post]
