Search for: "Burke v. Moyer"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Defendants Osborne Reed & Burke, LLP, Bressler & Kunze, Burke Albright Harter & Reddy, LLP and Moyer Russi & Randall, PC (hereinafter collectively referred to as the law firms) respectively moved pre-answer to dismiss the complaint against them as time-barred and for failure to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [5], [7]). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:18 am
“The underlying facts of this legal malpractice action are fully set forth in our prior decision wherein this Court affirmed Supreme Court’s order granting a motion by defendants Osborne Reed & Burke, LLP, Bressler & Kunze, Burke Albright Harter & Reddy, LLP and Moyer Russi & Randall, PC for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them as time-barred (209 AD3d 1205 [3d Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 909 [2023]). [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:41 pm
(Preliminary objection seeking to sever claims denied.).Moyer v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
Moyer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Moyer v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 12:18 pm
Moyer v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
Thomson, Jr., then sitting in Lackawanna County, offered a similar opinion in the case of Moyer v. [read post]
