Search for: "Burke v. State of Iowa"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
Vt. 2009) (unpublished opinion); Burks v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Thus the appeal in Janus v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
These cases are: Burke v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Nissan Motor Co., 139 F.3d 599, 602 (8th Cir. 1999) (applying Nebraska law); Burke v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Nissan Motor Co., 139 F.3d 599, 602 (8th Cir. 1999) (applying Nebraska law); Burke v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Nissan Motor Co., 139 F.3d 599, 602 (8th Cir. 1999) (applying Nebraska law); Burke v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Nissan Motor Co., 139 F.3d 599, 602 (8th Cir. 1999) (applying Nebraska law); Burke v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Burke Williams, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
Sanders, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:17 am
Trimark Physicians Group, 2009 WL 3760458, slip op. at 1-2 (Iowa Dist. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:53 am
Burks v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
This happens most frequently in Iowa: Mercer v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
A trial court’s duty to insure that a defendant understands the consequences of a guilty plea before he enters one extends only to direct consequences of such a plea.In addition, the United States Supreme Court, in Iowa v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
[Background on Quanta v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
