Search for: "Burks v. State of Minnesota"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
” The complaint alleges Sun made threats against officials with the city, interfered with a lawful court order, violated state custodial interference laws, and engaged in disorderly conduct. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
., v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
Burke, 414 F.3d 305, 321 (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Professor Jessica Litman, Wayne State University Law School, Detroit, Michigan; Professor Keith Aoki, University of Oregon School of Law; Professor Ann Bartow, University of South Carolina School of Law; Professor Dan Burk, University of Minnesota; Professor Julie Cohen, Georgetown University School of Law; Professors Christine Haight Farley and Peter Jaszi, Washington College of Law, American University; Professor Lydia Pallas Loren, Lewis and Clark College Northwestern… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:38 pm
Eileen Kane (Penn State) offers a clue in the distinction as between genetics and chemistry. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
March 15, 2004) (“duty to test . . . is not a separate cause of action under Minnesota law”); Kociemba v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
Autism: IN-SCHOOL AUTISM CARE COVERED, PENNSYLVANIA JUDGE SAYS, Burke v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:29 am
For example, in the Minnesota case of Burke v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:09 am
The USMJ also found that Minnesota v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
Several other Minnesota police agencies, including the Minnesota State Patrol, and the Burnsville Fire Department are looking to get their crews equipped with the cameras. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:23 am
Burke delivered the decision.Link: http://tinyurl.com/25pxwkz . [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
In Burke v. [read post]
