Search for: "Burley v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2021, 1:20 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Fruit of poisonous tree Ma’Ryan Burley-Carter, appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City after entering a conditional plea of guilty to one count of possession of heroin pursuant to Maryland Rule 4-242(d), preserving his right to appeal the denial of his pre-trial motion to ... [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am
In 18 June 2021, a Full bench of the Federal Court of Australia (Middleton, Nicholas, and Burley JJ) unanimously upheld a decision of a single judge of the court (Beach J), finding that a method of detecting cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum comprises patent-eligible subject matter (i.e. a ‘manner of manufacture’) under Australian law: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am
In 18 June 2021, a Full bench of the Federal Court of Australia (Middleton, Nicholas, and Burley JJ) unanimously upheld a decision of a single judge of the court (Beach J), finding that a method of detecting cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum comprises patent-eligible subject matter (i.e. a ‘manner of manufacture’) under Australian law: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:35 pm
; Burley v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 12:18 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Resisting arrest A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County found appellant, Donte Edward Burley, guilty of second-degree assault, reckless endangerment, and resisting arrest.1 The court sentenced appellant to: (1) five years’ imprisonment with all but eighteen months suspended for second-degree assault; and (2) ... [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:01 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:41 am
Burley J stated that while this approach allows the patent holder to impose limitations, the onus remains on them to communicate any limitations to the purchaser, or subsequent owners, at the point of sale or coming into ownership.In this case, the Epson cartridges had been refilled, and the memory chips were either reprogrammed or replaced by Ninestar, in order to restore them to their original condition. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Premier League v BT, UEFA v BT, Matchroom v BT and Queensberry v BT). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:42 pm
Criminal procedure — Discharge of counsel — Need for a hearing On June 9, 2017, a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted appellant, Rayvon Burley, of possession of heroin and possession of cocaine. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 3:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
"Gray v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:15 pm
" Whenever you see a case like State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 9:46 pm
I therefore indicated that I would not be at all surprised to see the decision appealed.Pfizer did indeed appeal, and a Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia has now handed down its decision, with three judges unanimous in overturning Justice Burley’s decision and granting Pfizer preliminary discovery: Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis AU Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 193.The key to Pfizer’s successful appeal lies in the wording of Rule 7.23(1)(a) of… [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:59 am
See, Burley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm
Criminal procedure — Jury exclusion — Witnessed defendant in shackles Convicted, by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, of second degree assault, Albert Burley claims that the court abused its discretion in denying his request to excuse a juror, who, according to two courthouse deputies, purportedly saw Burley, in shackles and handcuffs, ... [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:48 pm
State v. [read post]
