Search for: "Burnett v. Burnett"
Results 41 - 60
of 336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2021, 2:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6 October 2020… [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Second, G v G. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly… [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly… [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v… [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
On Monday 8 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Burnett or Grant v International Insurance Company of Hanover Limited. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:25 am
v=4DZDvcn3QKY&feature=youtu.be The video cuts off before Q and A and so you don’t see me standing and saying that as a lawyer of nearly 40 years, I was embarrassed that our beleaguered criminal justice system had found the resources to waste on such an extreme prosecution! [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:34 am
Burnett v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
See Salamone‑Finchum v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
In another essay for the series, Amelia Burnette explores United States Forest Service v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
In United States Forest Service v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:03 pm
The majority’s rule in Seila Law v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 3:25 pm
Burnett v US Air, Inc., 228 F.3d 1105, 1114-5 (9th Cir. 2000). [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:53 am
Burnett filed timely appeals from those determinations. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A Message [pdf] published this week by the Lord Burnett of Maldon CJ, Sir Terence Etherton MR and Sir Andrew McFarlane P, outlines how the Circuit and District Judges sitting in Civil and Family should deal with remote working. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
“The default position now in all jurisdictions must be that hearings should be conducted with one, more than one or all participants attending remotely”: Message to the Judges in the Civil and Family Courts, Lord Burnett of Maldon (19 March 2020) “It remains the obligation of all involved and at all stages of the hearing, to continue to evaluate whether fairness to all the parties is being achieved. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:30 am
"Last week HHJ Hacon, sitting in the High Court, concluded a remote two-day Pre-Trial Review in the ongoing Conversant v Huawei & ZTE case. [read post]
