Search for: "Burnett v. Burnett" Results 121 - 140 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2021, 2:25 am by steve cornforth blog
v=4DZDvcn3QKY&feature=youtu.be The video cuts off before Q and A and so you don’t see me standing and saying that as a lawyer of nearly 40 years, I was embarrassed that our beleaguered criminal justice system had found the resources to waste on such an extreme prosecution! [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Paul Ellis Graham will lecture on “Henry Lawrence Burnett: Prosecuting the Lincoln Conspirators” in the lower level of Monroe Town Hall (1465 Orange Turnpike, Monroe, [New York]) (The Chronicle). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgment Burnett LJ (with whom Sweeney J agreed) noted the centrality of the principle of open justice to the rule of law [16]. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Matthew Hill
In respect of the age discrimination claim, Burnett J did not treat this as a “suspect” ground. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
” Supreme Court grants cert in Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:05 am by INFORRM
Section 517 bars the media from informing the population on matters of interest which could otherwise be subject more widely to public debate: Edmonton Journal v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm by Isabel McArdle
Prashant Modi v United Kingdom Border Agency [2010] EWHC 1996 – Read judgment Mr Justice Burnett in the High Court has found that there was no breach of a man’s right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights) when he was refused entry to the UK for business purposes after conviction for a sexual offence. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 8 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Burnett or Grant v International Insurance Company of Hanover Limited. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 10:30 pm
The court found that the penological justifications suggested little likelihood of success on the merits.In Burnett v. [read post]