Search for: "Burns v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:05 am
These include shunting, ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch, or impaired diffusion. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:44 am
{In Hess v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:25 pm
Moreover, the district court judge that he draws here -- Judge Burns -- is not exactly what you would call a "soft on border crimes" type of judge. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:16 am
That campaign crashed and burned long before Election Day, however. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm
Lummi Nation (Fishing Treaty Rights) United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm
A promise that somewhat bit him in the ass when, one month after he was deported, he was again arrested in the United States for illegal reentry, and brought before the same district court judge that had sentenced him in the prior case. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:45 pm
Penal Code § 9.42; see, e.g., McFadden v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Malone v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:31 am
In Texas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
He stated [emphasis added]: “[27]. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:51 pm
Hasan v. [read post]
